Human Trafficking

There is a way to sell and buy children within the United States of America. Just get a foster care license and decide to adopt the child left in your care. It’s taboo to discuss it, but it happens every day in juvenile dependency court. Regardless of frills placed upon it, it is the business of human trafficking.

Our immediate trained response to questioning the child dependency court system, or child protective services, is to feel shame because the children who are supposed to be in this system are supposed to have been taken from abusive or neglectful parents. I submit to my readers that this assumption is not only false, but a suppression strategy of those profiting from this system.

Countless parents with varied cultural and educational backgrounds who are dealing with The System have come forward with one singular complaint: due process was not afforded them in the termination of their parental rights.

In layman’s terms, these parents were accused of abuse and or neglect of their children by the Department of Children and Family Services (CPS) and their parental rights were terminated in juvenile dependency court without due process. In some way, these parents were not permitted fair trials to clear their good names.

To boot, it would seem that the social workers who represent CPS have unlimited seizure power when it comes to removing children from their natural parents. Social workers have been known to break into people’s homes while they are not there to take photographs of a family’s home in effort to prove the home is not fit for children. They simply fill out a fill-in-the-blank piece of paper with legal terminology and file court documentation later that claims just cause for removing the child or children.

A study done on 87 juvenile dependency court judges throughout the United States of America bore unusual motivation for judges to render custody to foster-adoptive agencies, rather than allow biological parents to submit evidence and call witnesses to clear their good names: 85 out of 87 judges had clear financial affiliation with CPS contracted agencies, like adoption agencies.

Since juvenile dependency court is closed to the public and nobody but the accused and those accusing them are allowed into the courtroom, there are no witnesses when the judge shows bias by sustaining all objections by CPS to the parent’s request to call witnesses and or present relevant evidence to prove their case.

Often, juvenile dependency court judges sit on the boards of directors to these foster-adoptive agencies and turn a blind eye to the agency’s faults when the agency holds soirées every so often, presenting the judge with trophies, awards or even items of intrinsic value to thank the judge for making the judgments they have been making.

I found this information too late. I intend upon stopping this practice of human trafficking through knowledge. I believe it was Alex Jones who said sunlight is the best disinfectant. I agree.

Next Step program may do more harm than good

Reports of Siskiyou County's Next Step drug rehabilitation (perinatal) program running amok have led The Corruption Report to investigate it.

When most parents are in the throes of court proceedings with the Department of Children and Family Services, they tend to make the mistake of jumping through whatever proverbial hoops are presented to them by the Department of Children and Family Services.

Next Step is of the most common proverbial hoops in Siskiyou County.

Complaints of the two women running the program not having enough proper education to run such a program leaked to The Corruption Report several months ago. Video footage of one of the women in charge terrorizing a mother in the program for asking what coloring in coloring books had to do with drug rehabilitation was soon to follow.

There has been no reasoning given as to why Juvenile Dependency Court judges are requiring such a high percentage of the mothers accused of child abuse or neglect to go through this program, but one thing is for sure: the sheer volume of mothers forced to attend the program who have proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that they are not drug addicts has gained The Corruption Report's attention.

Two years ago, when Serenah's Angels did a study on 87 random judges dealing with DCFS cases, the results shocked the country. Only two judges did not have clear and convincing ties to DCFS contracted agencies, such as Next Step.

The results of judges ordering innocent parents to be tied up in the system when they should have their children at home with them is merely one aspect of what is haunting The System today.

Sources claim these programs do irreparable damage to the parents and families due to not having the proper education to run such a program is far more reaching in the lives of the children and families caught in The System than simply being separated from one another.

Reportedly, in addition to breaking the parent-child bonds of family in deciding to unnecessarily separate children from their natural parents, judges' orders sending parents to abusive and inefficient programs like Next Step may be placing families at further risk, sources say.

Serenah's Angels has made two distinctions in who to report DCFS judges who are tied to DCFS contracted agencies to in one way or another:

If the program is getting Federal monies, gather up all evidence against the judge, what damage the judge has caused by making the biased decision and turn them into your local Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) office. Physically visit them with the evidence, don't just call it in.

If the program is only getting County/State monies, gather up all evidence against the judge, what damage the judge has caused by making the biased decision and turn them into your state's Attorney General's office. Be sure not to alert your local District Attorney. Go straight to your state A.G.'s office, unless you are certain the District Attorney will be inclined to prosecute a local judge they have to face in court on a regular basis.

Is Child Protection targeting specific families?

Many families involved in "The System" are claiming to have been targeted.

What is worse, many parents who are claiming to be innocent of allegations of child abuse and/or neglect are claiming they, too, were in the foster care system and that the very fact that they were foster children at one point in their lives, as minors, is being considered as a reason against their ability to parent their own children.

Besides the obvious gesture of the fact that the system is openly admitting they cannot properly raise a child by using the fact that a parent is a "product of The System," as if they were now some sort of Frankenstein monster incapable of rearing children of their own years past their stint in The System, it begs one to wonder if this is true, how the Department of Children and Family Services is obtaining records of this kind and why these records would matter so much as to keep them.

After all, it does cost money to store these names and histories.

Rumor of a mysterious list led The Corruption Report to investigate the C.A.C.I.

The C.A.C.I. is the Child Abuse Central Index. Admission of it's existence and information on how to remove one's name from it can be found at the following website: http://www.ag.ca.gov/childabuse/

Subjects' information remains on the C.A.C.I. until they request to be removed from it if they are victims (or alleged victims) of child abuse. If someone is accused of being the abuser (not even convicted), they need the appropriate agency to recind the accusation in writing to the C.A.C.I. to be removed from it.

Don't forget to stop by our youtube: http://www.youtube.com/thecorruptionreport

Welcome to The Corruption Report

America used to be beautiful. People had rights. People had purpose. People used to be in charge. Now, We The People face off with Them: what seem to be demon possessed politicians.

We can't own certain books, say certain words or even send certain language via Email to crack our buddies up over the Internet. If we do, they hit us with the great unknown: legal repercussions.

What are these legal repercussions and are they even legal? Who is behind them and what motivates them? This will all be discussed in The Corruption Report.